Testing is an essential stage in software development, as it ensures that the product you are developing is perfectly precise and meets your requirements. It's reliable, secure, scalable and meets user expectations. There are multiple types of testing and all lead to development of high quality software and applications. Testing is done to identify and fix bugs at the right time, and to ensure reliability, high performance and improving user experience. In addition, testing also improves cost-effectiveness, security and facilitates agile development.
In this blog, we’ll break down:
Let’s start with the basics.
Quality Assurance testing is a fundamental step in the software development cycle that developers use to verify and assure the quality of a product before deployment or release. It does not involve building the software but testing its quality to ensure a secure and reliable final product which fulfils the outcome for which it is developed.
QA testing aims to enhance the quality of software and the efficiency of the development process. Its goal is to ensure that software developers deliver the best product that is reliable, secure, efficient and compliant with industry standards. Earlier, QA testers used to test the product during the end of development cycle, but soon they realized this was not optimal. So, now QA testers work alongside the custom software development team in a collaborative environment and suggest as well as implement solutions simultaneously.
Your app deserves more than guesswork. Our QA experts find bugs before your users do so you can relax, not react.
Unit testing is the process in which a team of individuals tests the smallest functional code unit. It tests the quality of code, and it's an integral part of software development. It is the first level of testing in software development lifecycle. Unit tests are conducted by developers on a code level.
A unit is the smallest part of an application or software capable of running independently. How you define a unit depends on the type of program. For example, a unit could comprise a few lines of code, a function, a class, or process. Also, sometimes testing a unit could mean testing an entire feature.
Unit testing is done at the smallest parts of an application or software, such as functions, methods or classes. It's done in isolation to make sure that each unit functions correctly for different input conditions. Unit testing helps developers detect bugs and fix them immediately. It helps them understand the codebase, which makes debugging a lot easier.
Functional testing checks whether your software actually does what it’s supposed to do.
It doesn’t care how the code is written or what happens under the hood. It’s all about validating that the system behaves correctly when users interact with it. Developer tests the app from the user’s perspective like a button click, form submission, payment processing and more. Does it work as expected? That’s what functional testing answers.
While unit testing looks at individual code blocks, functional testing focuses on entire features or workflows. It checks that the output matches the business requirements, and nothing breaks when components interact.
Also Read: Why is a Quality Assurance Tester Needed on a Software Development Team?
While all three are part of the software testing ecosystem, they serve different purposes, are performed at different stages, and involve different teams. Here’s how they stack up against each other.
Unit Testing: Unit testing has a primary goal to verify that each unit or component of the software works logically. A unit would refer to that part, which is usually a single function, method, or class, in a code base. Test cases are written by developers regarding their output concerning the expected outcome, often with mock data.
Functional Testing: While unit testing ensures that each individual piece of code works properly, functional testing deals with the whole software functionality concerning user requirements. Consequently, unit testing is truly concerned with testing the internal logic and output of isolated components on a code level. This means that functional testing is concerned fundamentally with system behavior.
QA Testing: QA (Quality Assurance) testing is about ensuring the whole software system works correctly and meets the specified requirements. The objective is to check for bugs, usability issues, or performance bottlenecks before delivering the software to the end users. The QA test goes further than simple unit testing and checks the whole approach of software as such.
Unit Testing: It is a low-level test, which is applied to small isolated pieces of code. Each test case would cover a specific function or method, which makes it highly focused. Unit tests are normally written side by side with developing the software, allowing early catching of issues.
Functional Testing: This falls under mid-level testing. It focuses on verifying specific features or user flows within the application like logging in, submitting a form, or placing an order. While it doesn’t go as deep as unit testing or as broad as QA testing, it ensures that key functions behave as expected. It typically comes after unit tests and before full-scale QA software testing.
QA Testing: Here you have a high-level testing that assesses the software from a broad perspective. The whole system is covered by the final product; all the interactions with different components and further integration with other systems and developments are taking apart the entire user experience. It is more comprehensive, and much of the testing is often conducted after unit testing.
Unit Testing: It is documentation unit testing mainly carried out by developers because they are most familiar with the internal structure and logic of the code. They usually write unit tests in the coding process and verify that their implementations work as desired.
Functional Testing: Functional tests are performed by QA testers, who execute test cases based on the functional requirements of software.
QA Testing: QA engineers or dedicated testing teams do this. These testers may or may not know any programming but know the good testing practices, the ways of test planning, and the reporting of bugs. In that sense, they do not consider the code at all; QA testers identify issues from the user's perspective.
Unit Testing: It is generally automated in a testing framework where like JUnit (for Java), NUnit (for .NET), xUnit (for C#), TestNG, and PyTest (for Python) are used to compile and run relatively faster test cases, for instance, as part of a continuous integration (CI) pipeline.
Functional Testing: Functional testing employs test automation tools such as Selenium for web applications, QTP for functional testing, Postman for API testing, and SoapUI for testing web services. Functional testing tools simulate user actions to verify software behavior.
QA Testing: It can be manual or automated, depending on the project requirements. Automated QA testing usually employs tools like Selenium (for web applications), JIRA (for bug tracking), QTest (for test management), TestRail (for tracking test cases), and Appium (for mobile testing).
Narrow Scope of Unit Testing: It involves testing of individual components or functions. It does not consider how units interact or how the entire system behaves. The very reason for the existence of tests is to check that the unit itself works.
Focused Scope of Functional Testing: It targets specific features and user interactions, ensuring they deliver the correct output based on defined requirements. While it goes beyond unit-level logic, it doesn’t cover system-wide concerns like performance or overall UX, that’s where QA testing takes over.
Broad Scope of QA Testing: All aspects related to the software, like integration testing, system testing, and user acceptance testing, fall into the QA testing domain. QA testing ensures that the entire software package runs as per the expectations, irrespective of how well individually isolated units perform.
Because your code might look perfect, but QA makes sure it behaves that way too.
Unit Testing: Automated testing of individual units is hardly considered for something manual because unit testing of small code segments is a repetitive affair. Automation regarding unit tests gives quick feedback during development for integration into the CI/CD pipeline.
Functional Testing: Can be automated, but will need manual testing as well in some test scenarios where user experience or interface functionality is evaluated.
QA Testing: It can be either manual or automated. Manual testing is required wherever human judgment matters, such as UI testing - A lot of automation is applied here for monotonous processes such as regression testing and load testing.
Unit Testing: Unit testing is usually done in the development phase. Developers write unit tests alongside writing new features or modifying existing code. This early approach to testing helps detect problems before they impact larger portions of the system.
Functional Testing: This is typically performed after unit testing but before full-scale QA testing. It takes place once individual components are integrated and ensures that the system’s features work as intended from a user-facing perspective. It serves as a bridge between code-level checks and full system validation.
QA Testing: Generally Transitioning here in the stage of after development and before the final deployment will act as the last wall to set in catching any problem that managed to escape earlier testing phases.
Unit Testing: This checks that individual functions, methods, or classes are functioning properly. It implements checks against logic paths taken, calculations involved, and expected outputs for explicit inputs.
Functional Testing: They test the functional behavior or usability as viewed by the users. In other words, "Does this software do what it's supposed to be doing?"
QA Testing: This is user-centric, with a major concern about how the system functions. It tries to ascertain whether the software indeed does perform as expected, from a usability, performance and reliability standpoint.
Unit Testing: Unit tests have a limited in scope to individual functions, methods, or small code blocks.
Functional Testing: Functional tests are generic in nature where broader use cases, end-to-end workflows, and whole user journeys are included.
QA Testing: QA testing has the widest polarity, it encompasses everything from individual components to complete systems, integrations, and even non-functional aspects like usability and performance. It’s not limited to code behavior but includes the overall product quality from start to finish.
Unit Testing: Basically considers the structure and logic of the code. Developers write tests while doing coding to check correctness.
Functional Testing: Designed from user requirements and specification point of view in order to validate the functional expectations of a product.
QA Testing: Based on overall product requirements, quality standards, and end-user expectations. It includes both functional and non-functional checks to ensure the software performs reliably, securely, and consistently across different scenarios.
Also Read: What is QA Team
Each type of testing plays a specific role at different stages of the development cycle. Knowing when to use which test helps you catch issues early, build confidently, and deliver a polished product. Let’s break it down.
With DITS QA testing, you get cleaner launches, fewer post-release disasters, and happier customers (and developers).
Each testing type plays a distinct but complementary role. Think of them as layers, unit testing secures the foundation, functional testing checks the structure, and QA testing reviews the entire building for safety, usability, and compliance.
Unit Testing Comes First: Developers write unit tests while coding to ensure that individual components behave correctly. It’s fast, isolated, and catches bugs early in the development phase.
Functional Testing Bridges the Gap: Once components are integrated, functional tests validate whether specific features work as intended based on user requirements. It confirms “what” the system does without diving into “how” it does it.
QA Testing Sees the Big Picture: QA testing comes in after the system is built. It verifies the full user experience, performance, usability, and whether everything works across devices, browsers, and edge cases.
Bug Detection at All Levels: Unit tests catch logic-level issues, functional tests flag feature-level bugs, and QA tests uncover real-world problems that surface only at scale or in varied conditions.
Complete Product Validation: When all three work together, you’re not just testing code, you’re validating the software from developer logic to user expectations, ensuring nothing slips through the cracks.
Both unit testing and QA testing are key components in the production of high-quality software. They help in the early detection of problems in the view of the developer (time would be considered to be spent on the attribute under tests) by checking the work of individual components, whereas QA testing would ultimately make sure that the entire application behaves right in the eyes of the user.
Unit Testing checks individual pieces of code in isolation. Functional Testing ensures specific features work as intended from a user perspective. QA Testing is a broader process that combines multiple testing types to validate overall software quality.
Unit Testing is performed typically during the development phase by the developers; it is all about testing the unit of code before being integrated into a bigger system. QA Testing is generally one of the roles, as the other part of the job usually involves evaluating the overall quality, performance, and user experience regarding the product. Functional Testing also involves QA testers or automation engineers, although, the assessment will be based on end users' perceptions in terms of validating each feature or function.
Unit testing is important because it helps recognize bugs early in the system and allows individual pieces of code to function correctly, but it does not ensure overall quality in software. Software needs to be tested from different angles, such as functioning, usability, performance, and security; thus, this is why QA Testing and Functional Testing are carried out across a much wider perspective evaluation, both applied and more user-centric.
Yes, Functional Testing can be automated using tools like Selenium, Cypress, or TestComplete. The automation proves to be very useful for regression testing where you need to run the same set of functional tests repeatedly as the application evolves. However, functional tests are generally tougher and slower to run than unit tests, and they would require some more maintenance after several changes in either user interface or business logic.
In a typical software development life cycle, Unit Testing is beforehand performed by the developers as they code themselves, shoot out a few bugs early and reduce the cost incurred in fixing the defects. After the units are integrated, QA Testing, which would perform Functional and Non-functional Testing on the overall product, is initiated. Functional Testing ensures that all unit features behave according to their design specifications, while QA Testing would include other elements like performance, security, and usability testing. All three testing techniques are important in ensuring that the product is delivered stable and of high quality.
21+ years of IT software development experience in different domains like Business Automation, Healthcare, Retail, Workflow automation, Transportation and logistics, Compliance, Risk Mitigation, POS, etc. Hands-on experience in dealing with overseas clients and providing them with an apt solution to their business needs.
Recent Posts
Get in touch